Software for the group close, consolidation and management reporting. One group went from a 15-day close to 2 days across 20+ entities, without replacing Tally: SNR Sons Charitable Trust, which runs Sri Ramakrishna Hospital.
| Entity | Source | Revenue |
|---|---|---|
| Good Industries | Tally Prime | 48,200 |
| Good Components | Tally Prime | 12,400 |
| Good Polymers | SAP S/4HANA | 9,650 |
| Good Logistics | Oracle Fusion | 5,180 |
| Good FZE | Oracle Fusion | 7,320 |
| Good Services | Tally Prime | 2,140 |
| Group, before eliminations | 84,890 | |
| Between | Raised | Eliminated |
|---|---|---|
| Good Components to Good Industries Components supplied to the parent | 4,280 | (4,280) |
| Good Polymers to Good Industries Moulded parts supplied to the parent | 1,640 | (1,640) |
| Good FZE to Good Industries Traded goods supplied to the parent | 530 | (530) |
| Good Industries to Good Components Interest on the loan to Good Components | 220 | (220) |
| Good Industries to Good Polymers Interest on the loan to Good Polymers | 160 | (160) |
| Net effect on group profit | — | 0 |
Both sides of every pair are removed, so group profit does not move.
| Total income | 79,190 |
|---|---|
| Total expenses | 70,715 |
| Profit before tax | 8,475 |
| Current tax | (2,180) |
| Deferred tax | (145) |
| Profit for the year | 6,150 |
| Non-current assets | 45,720 |
|---|---|
| Current assets | 40,500 |
| Equity | 45,540 |
| Non-current liabilities | 22,100 |
| Current liabilities | 18,580 |
| Total assets | 86,220 |
| Total equity and liabilities | 86,220 |
The problem
Each company's numbers sit in a different system, so people join them up by hand, every month.
Who has sent their trial balance, and what the unmatched intercompany item was, lives in a chat thread nobody can audit.
The consolidation is a workbook on someone's laptop. The board saw the version whose filename ended in v9.
The logic works, but it lives in one person's head. When they are on leave, the close waits.
Proof
Each figure is one customer's result, shared with their permission. The clips are them, in their own words.
FINAHQ cut our consolidation from three weeks to under four days.
Consolidation cycle, three weeks to under four days
FINAHQ impressed us from day one. The implementation was seamless, far faster than we anticipated.
More than 70% off Ind AS statement preparation time
We went from a 15-day close to 2 days. The platform handled our 20+ entities across multiple ERPs with accuracy we hadn't seen before. GL mapping got to 90% on the first run.
15 becomes 2 days
Working days to consolidated numbers
FINAHQ cut our quarterly consolidation effort by more than 75%.
More than 75% off quarterly consolidation effort
As a BSE listed company, our POC had to be reconciled to audit-level accuracy. The numbers matched our auditor's consolidated financials exactly. That gave our board the confidence to proceed.
Over a week saved; POC reconciled to audit
So the main problems that we were trying to solve was I need to prepare on a monthly basis approximately P &L accounts for around 20 institute which was actually not happening. So we were only preparing financial institutions for the largest financial statements for the largest institute. So we have been able to now provide management with timely reporting on on what is happening in the various units of the trust.
In 90 % of the cases the the AI driven suggestion that the tool was giving matched with the right places. So it minimized my work and by just using one centralized focal point to manage my in my process I am able to now publish MIS A, in time B, more accurately than before.
So, when FINAHQ team started providing results with the help of previous financial years data and and the result was produced in front of us and it was amazing. I mean the way the financials of the previous year came out.
Customers shown are customers of Ananta Group entities. A logo, quote or story does not mean a customer uses both products, and results described are specific to that customer.
What FINAHQ does
Two products on one foundation. Both work from the same mapped data, pulled from the same source systems.
FINAHQ · Close, intercompany, consolidation, statutory and SEBI reporting from approved templates.
FINAHQ, Munshi and FINK are all offered by Ananta Technology Services LLP.
FINK · Management reporting (MIS): cut by any dimension, budgets and forecasts, and questions in plain English.
FINK is offered by Ananta Technology Services LLP.
Munshi
Every other tool in this category still asks your team to key the disclosure numbers in. Munshi doesn't — it reads the trial balance from your ERP and builds each disclosure itself. Your team approves finished statements instead of assembling them, and every approval stays on record for your auditors.
Intercompany reconciliation
The problem: every company books the same intercompany deal its own way. Invoice numbers keyed differently on each side. GST the buyer can't claim stays with the buyer. Cut-off booked in the last week by one side only. Natures booked under another nature by the buyer. Munshi pulls every company's SAP G/L lines and open AR/AP items through FINAHQ — 17 companies, one table. One company keeps its own vendor and customer codes. They sit on their own rows, counted in that company's books only. Eliminate on an ICO control or a lead entity. GST the buyer can't claim stays as group cost. Leave a party out of a run. 100 intercompany pairs, matched invoice by invoice. 47 sit outside tolerance — and Munshi says why. Recon sheets are live SUMIFS on the tagged base data, quarter by quarter. You enter the stock still held and the seller's margin % — ₹10 Cr × 10%. Change it any time; every change is logged. Three draft journals — P&L, balances and hybrid — at L3/L4, in the lead entity's books. Every journal balances. Narrations name the pair, the recon and the reason for any difference. Nothing posts to the books until you approve. Send it back and the step runs again.
Year-end close
Munshi by FINAHQ. Good Group, year-end disclosures, prepared by Munshi. Three companies, year ended 31 March 2026, amounts in rupee lakh. Munshi prepared the year-end close for three companies. Across the whole group, just one thing needs your team: an approval. Every disclosure is built from the ledger. Nobody keyed a number. The statements prove themselves: 7a, the Balance Sheet foots, both years. Your team only reviews and approves. Ready for the auditors: draft statements downloaded, PDF and Excel. The group's year-end close: all three companies done.
Munshi reads what the group already publishes and drafts the plan. You approve it instead of building it.
Munshi asks each owner directly for what's needed, collects it and confirms — the chasing stops being your job.
Every request, confirmation and approval is logged automatically, so the trail is already there when they ask.
The roster, decisions and dates carry forward on their own — nothing rebuilt from scratch each quarter.
Reachable over MCP, the standard AI tools use to connect, so your team runs it from the tools they already use.
FINK
The same closed numbers, run by division, location, product and region — against budget, answered in plain English instead of waiting on a pack.
Allocate costs on your own drivers, including multi-step allocations.
Group ledgers the way the business is actually run, not the way it files.
Compare budget, actual and forecast, with a common-size budget builder and scenario modelling.
over 2 weeks becomes under 48 hours
Monthly management pack, from period end to available
DRA Homes
The product
Seven screens from FINAHQ and Munshi, from the consolidation workspace to statements ready to file. Shown on Good Group, our illustrative demo company.
Where the days go
6.4
fewer days on the close.
For a 7-person finance team closing 10 companies on TallyPrime. Every close, not just the first one.
| What the close is made of | Days today | Days with FINAHQ | Days saved | What changes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Collect trial balances from every company | 1.5 | 0.5 | 1.0 | Nobody exports, emails or pastes a file. Trial balances and entries arrive from each ERP on a schedule, on their own. |
| Clean up and map ledgers to the group format | 1.5 | 0.5 | 1.0 | Nothing to re-map every month. FINAHQ proposes the mapping once from your signed accounts, your team approves it, and only new ledgers ever come back for a decision. |
| Chase companies and teams for schedules and confirmations | 1.0 | 0.4 | 0.6 | The chasing stops being your job. Munshi asks each owner directly for what only they have, follows up on its own, and keeps the approval record your auditors will ask for. |
| Match intercompany balances and agree differences | 1.5 | 0.5 | 1.0 | Your team spends its time agreeing differences, not hunting for them. Balances are matched across companies automatically and listed by counterparty. |
| Eliminations, currency translation and minority interest | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.7 | Nothing recomputed by hand each period. Eliminations, translation and minority interest run from rules set once and are simply reviewed. |
| Draft balance sheet, P&L and cash flow | 1.0 | 0.2 | 0.8 | Statements are ready in your own format, in Excel, not assembled from scratch. They come straight from your approved Ind AS templates. |
| Prepare notes and disclosures | 1.5 | 0.7 | 0.8 | Most notes fill themselves from ledger and subledger data. What's left has a named owner and a sign-off, not a blank Excel tab. |
| Review, tie-out and audit queries | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.4 | Audit questions get answered on screen, not chased over email. Every number opens down to company, ledger and entry. |
| Across the whole close | 10.0 | 3.6 | 6.4 | Each component's share of the reference close, multiplied by how much of that component is taken off. Your own team size, company count and systems change it, which is what the calculator is for. |
Where the month goes
| What the pack is made of | Of the effort today | Taken off | What changes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pull actuals from each ERP | 15% | 70% | Nothing to pull together. Actuals are already in FINK, refreshed from each ERP. |
| Allocate shared costs | 20% | 80% | No manual allocation spreadsheet. Costs split on drivers you set, such as headcount, area or revenue. |
| Cut numbers by division, plant, segment or customer | 20% | 80% | Every report is already cut the way you need it, by division, plant, segment or customer, defined once. |
| Compare against budget and explain variances | 15% | 75% | Variances are already explained by line and dimension. Budget sits alongside actuals, not in a separate workbook. |
| Put the pack into management's format | 15% | 70% | Your MIS workbook looks exactly as it does today. It just refreshes itself every month. |
| Answer follow-up questions | 15% | 60% | No more digging for a one-off answer. Follow-ups are asked in plain English and answered from the same numbers. |
| Across the whole month | 100% | 73% | Each component's share of the month, multiplied by how much of that component is taken off. Your own dimensions and systems change it, which is what the calculator is for. |
Integrations
Reading your trial balance read-only, on the version you already run, is step one. The work is everything Munshi does with it after: closing, consolidating and building every disclosure your team used to key in by hand.
TallyPrime 4.x to 7.x, Tally ERP 9
Read-only, through Tally's XML interface
S/4HANA Cloud and on-premise 2020 to 2024, ECC 6.0 EHP6 and above
Read-only, through OData
Fusion Cloud 23A to 24D, E-Business Suite R12.1 and R12.2
Read-only, through the GL Balances API
All NetSuite accounts
Read-only, through NetSuite's standard interfaces
All versions, including Dynamics 365, NAV and Navision
Scheduled export
QuickBooks Online, QuickBooks Online Accountant
Read-only, through OAuth 2.0
All Zoho Books plans
Scheduled export
Trust and deployment
Read-only access, your own infrastructure if you want it, and an audit trail that goes back to the journal entry.
Tell the calculator your entities, your systems and how long your close takes today. It shows its working.